Greenwood v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Busk. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Williamson, The opinion of the court indicates the character of this case, and discloses such facts as are relevant to the rulings.
1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.
The defendant was indicted and convicted of an assault upon one James Hampton with intent to *590kill and murder. The charge of the court upon the ¡trial of the case was, so far as it went, a correct enunciation of the law applicable to the facts of the case. It .cannot be expected that a court, in every criminal case, will or should give in charge to the jury every principle of law which might be applied to the facts of the particular case, and the omission to give a particular charge .is not such an error as would require a reversal of the judgment, unless the court, upon being asked by a party…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Connell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Cornell v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1823
3Cited by23 opinions
- McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Kemper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Hobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Richards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.