Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Baldwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1884No. 10,110PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the White Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

— The appellees Baldwin and Spencer sued the appellants and John G. Reynolds upon their joint and several promissory note. A return of not found as to the defendant John G. Reynolds was suggested on the record. The other defendants answered in one paragraph, wherein they denied that they executed the note sued on, and alleged that it was executed without any consideration. The plaintiffs replied by a general denial.

The cause was submitted for trial before a jury. The plaintiffs introduced two witnesses, who testified that the services *58of an attorney in collecting the note sued on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. ClementsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Fetters v. Muncie National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Fritz v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Wyant v. PottorffIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Smiley v. MeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Theis v. Board of County Com'rs of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Robbins v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Starnes v. SchofieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API