Legal Opinion

Farr v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 21, 2022No. 4:21-cv-08099Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CYNTHIA FARR, Case No. 21-cv-08099-JSW 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 11 v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 12 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO., Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendant. 13 14 15 Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Pacific Gas & Electric 16 Co. (“Defendant”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the 17 record in this case, and it finds the motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument. See 18 N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API