Legal Opinion

United States v. O'Shaughnessy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1994No. C8-93-2403PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WAHL, Justice.

The United States District Court, District of Minnesota, certified to this court, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 480.061 (1992), the following question of state law:

Under Minnesota law, does the beneficiary of a discretionary trust with the provisions described herein have “property” or any “right to property” in nondistributed trust principal or income before the trustees have exercised their discretionary powers of distribution under the trust agreement?

According to the facts set out in the Order, Lawrence P. O’Shaughnessy is a beneficiary of two separate identical trusts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Marriage of Janssen v. JanssenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. First National Bank v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mary Scanlan v. Marshall EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. In Re HortonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API