Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightcap

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1893No. 766PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

Lightcap sued the railroad company for damages. He alleges, in his complaint,.that the appellant, on the 14th day of July, 1891, owned and operated a railroad and was a common carrier of passengers for hire, between North Judson, in Stark county, Indiana, and Logansport, in the same State; that on said day the appellee purchased a ticket from the appellant, entitling him to ride from North Judson to Logansport, and from there back to North Judson, and that he paid *251therefor the sum of $2.20, which was the regular price for first-class fare; that, in pursuance of the contract, the appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NuzumIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. HattonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ApplewhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. RenickerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Indiana, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. DittoIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. NorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. FieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API