Legal Opinion

Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Wilson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1898No. 2,421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The complaint of the appellee, May D. Wilson, after its introductory matter, showed, in substance, that on the 6th day of August, 1895, the appellant, by its ticket agent at Vincennes, notified all persons desiring to purchase tickets over its railroad for the purpose of attending a picnic being held in the vicinity of Purcells, that its passenger train going north through that place at about 8:45 or 9 o’clock *6p. m. on that day, would stop and take such persons as desired to be carried as passengers on said train, which passed through Purcells for Vincennes at that time; that on that day, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NuzumIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. HattonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ApplewhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. DumserIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fenlon v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Union Traction Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API