Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Central Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1937No. 33,385PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

This was an action for damages on account of injuries received in an automobile collision. Judgment was for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The injury to the plaintiff resulted from an automobile accident which occurred about 7:30 o’clock p. m., after dark, on October 18, 1935, on U. S. highway No. 36, about five and one half miles west of Mankato, Kan. The father of the plaintiff was the owner of a 1924 model Chevrolet coupé, and at the time of the collision the coupé was being driven by plaintiff’s father. Mr. Dickson was riding in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Schultz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Ferguson v. LangSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Link v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Shrewsbury v. GoodacreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Eaton v. SalyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Schmid v. EslickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Sams v. Commercial Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Hurla ex rel. Hurla v. Capper Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Bedenbender v. WallsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API