Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1936No. 2 Div. 583PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The defendant and one other, being indicted separately in indictments charging in the first count distilling whisky and in the second count with being in possession of a still, by consent were tried jointly.

On the trial, the defendant, alone, was convicted on the first count of the indictment of the offense of an attempt to manufacture prohibited liquors, and his fine was fixed at $50, to which the court added an additional punishment of six months at hard labor.

On the trial and on the cross-examination of the -defendant while he was being examined as a witness, the solicitor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. . MoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Graham v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lakey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Abrams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Broadhead v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. De Graaf v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Lightfoot v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Ledbetter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Cochran v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API