Legal Opinion

Broadhead v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1932No. 1 Div. 54PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The sentence to hard labor as to the costs of this case appearing in the judgment is ineffective and fails to comply with the mandatory provision which requires the trial court to determine the time, that is to say, the number of days required to work out the costs at the rate of 75 cents per day. Section 5291 of the Code prescribes, “ * * * if the costs are not presently paid or judgment confessed therefor, as provided by law, then the court may impose additional hard labor for the county for such period, not to exceed ten months, as may be sufficient to pay the costs, at the rate of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. . MoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Graham v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. De Graaf v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Kilpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Whiddon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Cochran v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Golston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API