Legal Opinion
American Stainless Steel Co. v. Ludlum Steel Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 16, 1923No. 233PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1]' Judgment in this case seems to us primarily to depend on ascertainment of patent validity and scope. This is a prerequisite to determination of the place in the art, or that branch of art, to which the patents belong. If this invention be found broadly new, meritorious in ingenuity, and lying at the foundation of a wholly novel development of human labor, it should receive in construction a liberality too well recognized to need additional exposition, though we may point out that Treibacher v. Roessler, 219 Fed. 210, 135 C. C. A. 108, is a rather…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Pittsburgh Iron & Steel Foundries Co. v. Seaman-Sleeth Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Treibacher-Chemische Werke Gesellschaft mit Beschrankter Haftung v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Zoomar, Inc. v. Paillard Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Radtke Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- International Nickel Company v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.