Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Argo

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 25, 1997No. 96-0101; Crim.App. No. 30830Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Judge

I agree with the majority that appellant’s case may be affirmed under our case law. Nevertheless, I conclude that one must step closer and take a harder look at the facts of this case in order to reach this just result. See generally United States v. Drayton, 45 MJ 180, 183 (1996) (Sullivan, J., dissenting).

This is an important case. It is really about fairness in the military justice system and the concern of Congress that military prosecutions be perceived as fair by service-members and the American public. Art. 37, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 837. Appellant challenges as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. FrazierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. HoggardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. CaritativoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. DraytonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API