Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoggard

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 26, 1995No. 94-0535; CMR No. 9201632PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2 Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

1. Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of rape, adultery and indecent assault (3 specifications), in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920 and 934, respectively. The general court-martial composed of officers and enlisted members sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 12 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged, and the Court of Military Review* affirmed. We granted review of the following issue:

WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  3. United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. CottrillCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. KiblerArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. ArgoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. CalamitaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API