Mangano v. Marston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
One of the hands of the plaintiff, who among other pursuits was a professional boxer, was injured in the collision of two automobiles which, as the evidence warranted finding, was caused by negligence of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff.
Two witnesses called by the plaintiff were found by the trial judge, without objection or exception of the defendant, *134to be qualified to testify as experts. One testified that prior to the plaintiff’s injury he was “promising ... as a fighter” and the other that he was “a very good looking prospect as a professional fighter.” To this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Jackson v. AnthonyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Commonwealth v. SpiropoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Lenehan v. TraversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Guinan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doherty v. RuizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Ruschetti's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Leave v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940