Legal Opinion

Mangano v. Marston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

One of the hands of the plaintiff, who among other pursuits was a professional boxer, was injured in the collision of two automobiles which, as the evidence warranted finding, was caused by negligence of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff.

Two witnesses called by the plaintiff were found by the trial judge, without objection or exception of the defendant, *134to be qualified to testify as experts. One testified that prior to the plaintiff’s injury he was “promising ... as a fighter” and the other that he was “a very good looking prospect as a professional fighter.” To this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Jackson v. AnthonyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Commonwealth v. SpiropoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Lenehan v. TraversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Guinan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doherty v. RuizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Ruschetti's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Leave v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API