Legal Opinion

Swindal v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 15, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The declaration in this case, which was adjudged bad on demurrer, counts in substance on an allegation by plaintiff below that the defendant, City of Jacksonville, while engaged in the quenching, controlling, smothering and fighting of a fire in the city, created a dangerous nuisance in the city streets by leaving unguarded a certain fire hydrant and high pressure hose connected therewith which being left in that condition endangered the lives and safety of pedestrians on the city sidewalks, in consequence of which plaintiff, while lawfully walking along a sidewalk of the city where she had a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. City of Tallahassee v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Chardkoff Junk Co. v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. City of West Palm Beach v. GrimmettSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. State v. MimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. BethelSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Steinhardt v. Town of North Bay VillageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Barth v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Barth v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API