Legal Opinion
Chardkoff Junk Co. v. City of Tampa
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 21, 1931PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C. J.
— Plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the court below and filed against the defendant in error. Its amended declaration was in four counts. The first count of the amended declaration was as follows:(1) “Plaintiff alleges that on the........day of November, 1929, it owned and operated a certain warehouse located on Maryland and Ruby Street in the City of Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, which contained certain merchandise a list of which together with its value is hereto attached as exhibit “A”, and made a part hereof as if fully set out herein.(2) That the defendant on the........day of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oliver v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Missano v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Keggin v. County of HillsboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Kaufman v. City of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fla. Dept. of Rev. v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Jetton v. Jacksonville Elec. Auth.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Elrod v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- City of Lakeland v. AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- City of Tampa v. EastonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.