Law Office G.A. Lambert and Associates v. Davidoff
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, the Law Office G.A Lambert and Associates (“Plaintiff’), has filed an action against its former clients, Defendants Tofik Davidoff, Kalimantano GmbH, and First Royal Services GmbH (“Defendants”), alleging that Defendants defrauded Plaintiff and failed to pay legal fees and costs owed to Plaintiff. Presently before this court is Plaintiffs [19] Request for Default Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Default Judgment. Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions 1 , the relevant legal authorities, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- John C. Keegel v. Key West & Caribbean Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger DhimantecCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Law Office G.A. Lambert and Associates v. DavidoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- (PS) Sarkis v. Yolo County Public Agency Risk Mgt. Ins. AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Head v. Citigroup IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Marcie Hamilton v. JUUL Labs, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Paniani Taafua v. Quantum Global Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.