Legal Opinion
Law Office G.A. Lambert and Associates v. Davidoff
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 30, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1734PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, the Law Office G.A. Lambert and Associates (“Plaintiff’), has filed an action against its former clients, Defendants Tofik Davidoff, Kalimantano GmbH, and First Royal Services GmbH (“Defendants”), alleging that Defendants defrauded Plaintiff and failed to pay legal fees and costs owed to Plaintiff. Presently before this Court is Plaintiffs [30] Renewed Motion for Default Judgment. Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, 1 the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, and for the reasons…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Adkins v. TeseoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Auxier Drywall, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Young v. SarlesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Paige International, Inc. v. Xl Speciality Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- IMMUNEX CORPORATION v. SANDOZ INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Seo v. OhDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- SiOnyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021