Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. Bone

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 27,836PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This proceeding chronicles another chapter of litigation concerning the bank guaranty law and presents a question ■concerning the proper method of distributing its fragmentary assets among its many creditors, in view of the admitted and familiar fact that the bank depositors’ guaranty fund is insolvent, and the methods devised by the statute for the rehabilitation of the fund have virtually ceased to function.

The case presented takes the form of mandamus, but in effect it ■calls for the distribution of a trust fund. The state’s application…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brewster v. MohlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Griffith v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Hicks v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Cates v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Thompson v. BoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Wyman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Bailey v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API