Legal Opinion

Cates v. Knapp

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1919No. 21,794PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action is one of mandamus, to compel the-state auditor to issue a warrant on the treasury for the payment of money.

■ The board of state fair managers let a contract to the plaintiff for the installation of an electrical system in one of the state fair buildings. The work was performed, the plaintiff’s claim was approved by the board of state fair managers, and a proper voucher-was duly given him. The auditor refused to issue a warrant, because of illegality of the claim, not discovered by the board.

The petition was sufficient in form and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hicks v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Barton v. MulvaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Heman Construction Co. v. CapperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Bailey v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Board of Regents of University & State Colleges v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API