Legal Opinion

Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Metallizing Co. of America

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 1, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining defendants, who are partners doing business as the Metallizing Company of America, from infringing United States Letters Patent No. 2,320,327 (applied for August 6, 1942, and issued May 25, 1943) and the Reissue Patent No. 22,397 (applied for August 14, 1943, and issued November 30, 1943), directly or indirectly, and from contributorily infringing the reissue patent.

Defendants move to dismiss or strike paragraphs 13 and 14 of the complaint, which allege contributory infringement, or if that is denied, for a more…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  2. Krieger v. ColbyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  3. Aeration Processes, Inc. v. Walter Kidde & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948
  4. Grinnell Corporation v. American Monorail CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  5. Armstrong v. Emerson Radio and Phonograph Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API