Legal Opinion

Grinnell Corporation v. American Monorail Company

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 23, 1967No. Civ. A. 4216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

By complaint filed November 9, 1962 plaintiff sues for infringement of Fain patent 2,981,644 which issued to it April 25, 1961 on an application filed by Mitchell S. Fain. The patent, entitled Method of Cleaning Looms, relates to a method of removing lint from a series of looms arranged in a row. The method involves the use of a high velocity stream of air which is directed down onto looms and is continuously moved through a particular path, as described and claimed in the patent, in order to blow lint off the looms, but without interfering with the operation.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Binks Manufacturing Company, Etc. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  3. Fromberg, Inc. v. Jack W. ThornhillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  5. Lever Bros. Co. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blohm & Voss AG v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  2. Maschinenfabrik Rieter A. G. v. Greenwood MillsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1972
  3. Plasser American Corp. v. Canron, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1980
  4. Gould v. General Photonics Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1982
  5. Malsbary Manufacturing Co. v. Ald, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API