Legal Opinion

Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Harrity

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFead, C. J.

Plaintiff had judgment in garnishment. The garnishee defendants bring error.

The affidavit in garnishment was filed April 14, 192'5. The disclosure, filed April 30, 1925, states, in substance, that on November 19, 1924, the garnishee defendants entered into a contract to purchase from the principal defendant its garage business, and goods and chattels belonging thereto, for $6,000. At that time they paid $2,500 to the defendant under a written agreement that, within 72 hours, the defendant, out of such payment, would pay all its debts which might be a lien upon the property, such payment being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albright v. StockhillMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Christian v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hobson v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greenberg v. New York City Planning CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API