Legal Opinion

Hobson v. Kelly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Garnishment proceedings. Garnishee defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against Kelly for $1,217.40. Upon bringing suit against the principal defendant, plaintiff instituted garnishee proceedings against Hill and Vincent. The circuit judge directed a verdict against the garnishee defendants, who appealed.

The defendants filed a disclosure, stating that at the time said writ was served upon them they were indebted to Kelly in the sum of $1,717.28, unless they had become liable to other parties upon certain orders which Kelly had given upon them, aggregating about $2,800. Defendants had not accepted these orders, and it is conceded that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Townsend v. Cass Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donohoe-Kelly Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Christian v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. HarrityMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API