Legal Opinion
Silberman v. Biderman
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 17, 1990No. CV-89-1736 (RJD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEARIE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs challenge housing regulations promulgated by the City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development (“HPD”) and applicable to Cad-man Towers, Inc. (“Cadman Towers”) on the grounds that the regulations violate the Due Process, Equal Protection and Takings Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982); they also mount state-law claims based on Article 78 of New York's Civil Practice Law and Rules, N.Y.Civ.Prac.L. & R. §§ 7801 et seq. (McKinney 1981), and on the New York State Constitution.…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Community Housing Improvement Program v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Vink v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Robinson v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- New York State United Teachers v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 2014