Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Brown.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 26, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

AgtioN by J. V. Eisber against R. A. Brown, heard by Judge W. II. Neal, at October Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Cabarrus County. Erom a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, R. A. Brown, had been removed from the guardianship of Lilly Ury, and this action was then brought by the plaintiff, as the newly appointed guardian, against the defendant R. A. Brown and the other defendants, sureties on his guardian bond, for an account and settlement of the guardianship. The case was referred to the clerk of the Superior Court to state the account. The report of the referee was filed and confirmed by the Court. The first exception of the defendant which we will consider is the one to the receiving by the referee, as evidence, an admission made by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burke v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. State Ex Rel. Carr v. AskewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Rudd v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Rose v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Rose v. Bank of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Foreman v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API