Beasley v. Assets Conservation Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
By this action the plaintiffs sought to enjoin the payment of, and to have declared invalid, about $10,000 worth of warrants issued by an irrigation district. From a judgment granting the relief prayed, this appeal is taken.
In Grant county, this state, there is a body of water called Brook lake, and a few miles below it are some 6,000 acres of irrigable lands. The Stafford Irrigation Company bought these lands and obtained the right to take the water from this lake for irrigation purposes. It then proceeded to sell the land, each deed containing a provision to the effect that the purchaser…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. ChandlerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Hill v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Rose v. KimballWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- N. E. Burkitt Motor Co. v. City of StuartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Bridgeport Irr. Dist. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports1996
- Motter v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Motter v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933