Legal Opinion

Standard Rice Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 7, 1944No. 45584PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff, whose business was milling rice, made, on November 13, 1935, a contract to sell a large quantity of milled rice to the Government, for the Navy. The contract contained the following paragraph: “Prices bid herein include any federal tax heretofore imposed by the Congress which is applicable to the material on this bid. Any sales tax, duties, imposts, revenues, excise or other taxes which may hereafter (the date set for the opening of this bid) be imposed by the Congress and made applicable to the material on this bid will be charged to the Government and entered on invoice as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. American Packing & Provision Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. Kansas Flour Mills Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Suncook Mills v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Specialty Assembling & Packing Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. United States v. Standard Rice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Vogt Bros. Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Breese Burners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. York Engineering & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API