Legal Opinion
Succession of Ott
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 27, 1935No. 32919PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Justice.
On the death of her husband, Albert Ott, Mrs. Magdalena Ott qualified as the administratrix of his succession. During the course of the administration, WashburnCrosby Company, Inc.,, alleging breach of contract, sued the succession for $2,966.25 as damages, citing Mrs. Magdalena Ott as the administratrix. She excepted to plaintiff’s petition, and later, after her exceptions were overruled, answered the suit, denying all liability and asking that the suit be dismissed.
While the suit of Washburn-Crosby Company, Inc., was at issue but untried, Mrs. Ott filed and advertised her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maxwell-Yerger Co. v. RoganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Anderson's Administrator v. Birdsall's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Succession of JacobsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
- Pickett v. GilmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Stafford v. Succession of McIntoshSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Succession of UthoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Succession of RabbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Succession of Kilpatrick v. First National Bank of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Succession of LombardoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Succession of BraunSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.