Legal Opinion

Succession of Uthoff

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 6, 1941No. 35965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs instituted this suit to set aside the judgment placing the residuary legatee in possession of the property of the late Henry Uthoff on the ground that the legatee failed to make any provision for the satisfaction of their unliquidated claims against Uthoff's succession which are in litigation.

The defendant filed a number of exceptions, the only ones which did not pass out of the case in the lower court being those of lis pendens and of no cause and no right of action. From the judgment of the lower court maintaining the plea of lis pendens and dismissing their suit, the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Saxon v. Southwestern Brick & Tile Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Hall v. NevillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  3. Bradshaw v. KnollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  4. Esparros v. VicknairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  5. Succession of FiskSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guilliot v. City of KennerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Blaize v. CazezuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. Bannister v. Chisesi LongoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Pittman v. LillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  5. Roccaforte v. BarbinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API