Legal Opinion
Munson Line, Inc. v. Green
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1946PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
The defendants move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12 (b) (6), F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
Three claims for relief arising out of the same facts and circumstances are alleged in the complaint. They are based upon (1) wrongful interference with the business of the plaintiff, (2) conspiracy in violation of Section 580, subsection 3 of the New York Penal Law, Consol. Laws, c. 40, and (3) malicious prosecution.
The plaintiff, a Maryland corporation, whose principal business at the present time is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Opera on Tour, Inc. v. WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Odell v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Protection Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Park & Tilford Distillers Corp. v. Distillers Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Munson Line, Inc. v. GreenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.