Bosco v. Bauermeister
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.
I
In this case, we are called upon to determine the priority of coverage of several insurance policies, all of which admittedly provided coverage for the automobile accident that is the subject matter of the underlying lawsuit. We conclude that a distinct difference exists between “true” excess insurance coverage and excess “other insurance” on the basis of the difference in policy types within the insurance industry, the premiums charged for and risks assumed by the policies, the language of the policies, and the reasona ble expectations of all the contracting parties. This difference…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Illinois Emcasco Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- United States Fire Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Horace Mann Insurance v. General Star National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- John Michael McGow v. Billy Joe McCurryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. LangreckIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pioneer State Mutual Insurance v. TIG InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.