People v. Randle
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
The central question presented by this case is whether one who kills in the actual but unreasonable belief he must protect another person from imminent danger of death or great bodily injury is guilty of voluntary manslaughter, and not murder, because he lacks the malice required for murder. In other words, should California recognize the doctrine of imperfect defense of others? We conclude the answer is, yes.
*991I. Factual and Procedural Background
The homicide victim Brian Robinson lived with his parents and his cousin, Charles Lambert. Late one evening, as Robinson drove up to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. BookerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.