Legal Opinion

People v. Randle

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2005No. S117370PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The central question presented by this case is whether one who kills in the actual but unreasonable belief he must protect another person from imminent danger of death or great bodily injury is guilty of voluntary manslaughter, and not murder, because he lacks the malice required for murder. In other words, should California recognize the doctrine of imperfect defense of others? We conclude the answer is, yes.

*991I. Factual and Procedural Background

The homicide victim Brian Robinson lived with his parents and his cousin, Charles Lambert. Late one evening, as Robinson drove up to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. BookerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API