Legal Opinion

Lipman v. Manger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1924PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling demurrers to a complaint. Each defendant demurred gen*65erally and on the ground that several causes of action were improperly united. The complaint is very long and we shall only state its contents so far as is necessary tO' present the points involved. The defendant Clara Manger married Arthur Manger in 1901. Between that time and 1911 Arthur Manger became involved in business and was unable to continue, and then Clara Manger took over the business, operating it as a sole trader in the name of Arthur Manger, he acting as the manager. In 1911 Clara…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rozek v. RedzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Meissner v. MeissnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Frailing v. SieberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Krouskop v. KrouskopWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bosanich v. Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Milwaukee Toy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lind v. O. N. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Bembinster v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. McIntyre v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API