Einstein Associates LLC v. DAP Industries LLC
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Einstein Associates LLC, No. CV-20-02184-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 DAP Industries LLC, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Einstein Associates LLC’s Motion for 16 Alternative Service (Doc. 12). The Court now rules on the motion. 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Federal Rule”) 4(e)(1) provides, in relevant part, 18 that “[u]nless federal law provides otherwise, an individual . . . may be served in a judicial 19 district of the United States by . . . following state law for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018