Legal Opinion

In re the Claim Lavi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 22, 1997, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.

Claimant, a former furniture sales representative, filed an original claim for benefits and established a base period beginning on March 13, 1995 and ending on March 10, 1996. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PokornyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re the Claim of PranzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of RiberdyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API