Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Pranzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 6, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had insufficient weeks of covered employment in her base period. As a result, claimant was charged with an overpayment of benefits. It was ultimately found that claimant’s statements…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Di Maria v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KwiatkowskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim LaviAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claims of EngellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API