Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Pokorny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 25,1994, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.

Claimant, a car cleaner for the New York City Transit Authority, was deemed ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he only worked four weeks during the applicable base period. Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant’s failure to work a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Jodi VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re Chad H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re Jamie EE.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. In re Libby G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. In re the Claim LaviAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API