Legal Opinion
State v. Spencer
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 20, 2005No. 52817-3-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*135¶1 In violation of a no-contact order, Steven Spencer went to Shelia Quinn’s apartment, entered, and remained for several minutes despite requests by Quinn and her son, Aaron Skinner, for Spencer to leave. Spencer was found guilty of residential burglary and violation of a court order. Spencer claims that substantial evidence does not support his conviction for residential burglary, he was denied a unanimous verdict, and his Sixth Amendment rights were violated when the judge, and not the jury, determined that the offenses were domestic violence crimes. Because substantial evidence supports a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In re the Detention of KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. Abdi-IssaWashington Supreme Court · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.