Legal Opinion

In re Ingersoll

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 4, 2006No. Misc. No. 823PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C. and William C. Rowland petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to vacate its July 28, 2006 order affirming a magistrate judge’s June 30, 2006 order that compelled Buchanan and Rowland to (1) provide certain documents for inspection, and (2) pay Balterio, N.V., Norman D. Lifton Co., Inc., and Balta U.S., Inc. (Balterio) the costs and fees incurred in filing a motion to compel. Balterio opposes. Balterio moves without opposition to substitute William J. McCabe as principal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
In Re Calmar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
In Re Dg Acquisition Corp. Debtor. Dg Creditor Corp., Trustee for the Dg Creditor Trust v. Ivette Dabah, Barbara Dabah, Renee Dabah, and Yvette DabahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

400 Walnut Associates, L.P. v. 4th Walnut Associates, L.P. (In re 400 Walnut Associates, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012