Legal Opinion

Borden v. Humm

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 7, 2007No. 06-P-770Published

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

On August 5, 1987, Raymond and Gertrude Borden, husband and wife (together, the Bordens), entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell two adjacent lots (lots 11 and 12) located at 776 East Street in Carlisle to their daughter and son-in-law, Beverly and Edward Daniel Humm, Jr. (together, the Humms). Lot 12 was improved with a house; lot 11 was a vacant hay field. On the same day, the Bordens, as sellers, and the Humms, as buyers, entered into a side agreement providing, in pertinent part:

*103“1. That although the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated August 5, 1987 . . . covers approximately 7…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bongaards v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Sands v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Dana v. GringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Phelps v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Pierce v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API