Legal Opinion

Bongaards v. Millen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 12, 2003PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.

The plaintiff filed a complaint in the Probate and Family Court, seeking a declaration that certain property held in trust by his deceased wife, Jean Bongaards (Jean), should be considered part of her estate for purposes of determining his elective share under G. L. c. 191, § 15, the statute permitting a surviving spouse to waive will provisions and elect instead to receive a statutory portion of the estate of the deceased spouse. The plaintiff’s first amended complaint also asserted that assets in a bank savings account maintained by Jean should be subject to his elective share. Acting on…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Kerwin v. DonaghyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Cleaveland v. Malden Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Williams v. MassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Bevilacqua v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. MeansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Giuffrida v. High Country Investor, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Greene v. General Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API