Pierce v. Doyle
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Daniel Pierce, trustee of a trust created under Article 15(b) of the will of the late Charles Sumner Pierce (testator), commenced this action in the Probate and Family Court seeking reformation of the trust. The parties have stipulated to the relevant facts, and the defendants — including Caroline Merriam Doyle, her husband, her children, and their adult issue — have assented to the requested relief. A guardian ad litem, appointed to represent the interests of the minor parties and unborn or unascertained persons who may become interested in the trust, also has joined in the stipulation and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Walker v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Berman v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- BankBoston v. MarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Dana v. GringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- U.S. Trust Co., N.A. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Borden v. HummMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007