Ardonis Greer v. Wayne J. Wiedenhoeft
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 91. {dissenting). The majority opinion devotes only two paragraphs to what is the main focus of Greer's argument: he was denied due process because he did not have notice that he was on probation. Majority op., ¶¶ 67-68. The bulk of its analysis frames the due process issue as focusing instead on the Department of Correction's ("DOC") failure to accurately maintain records. Id., ¶¶ 38, 56, 63-66. It downplays the fact that the DOC informed Greer on several occasions that his probation was complete, and suggests that Greer received due process because he was present at his sentencing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Rickey Dean SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John Andrew DaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Wisconsin v. LaxtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Madison Airport Co. v. WrabetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.