Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murray

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1977No. 1740PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

On February 24, 1976, appellant was found guilty following a non-jury trial in which one indictment charged appellant with theft by unlawful taking or disposition 1 and receiving stolen property, 2 and another indictment charged appellant with criminal conspiracy. 3 Appellant was sentenced to concurrent six to twenty-three month prison terms on both bills of indictment. This appeal followed. We find the evidence to be sufficient to sustain both convictions, and affirm.

In considering appellant’s assertion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, we must…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. EilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. RifeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. CarsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. BooneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. LynchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API