Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lynch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1980No. 1518, 1519, 2538, 2539PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

By order of the Supreme Court dated February 28, 1979, (Allocatur Docket No. 3926) we have been directed to rule on the Commonwealth’s petitions1 to extend the time under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(c) for bringing the defendants to trial, in conjunction with our decisions in the Commonwealth appeals from the granting of the writs of habeas corpus and the discharge of the defendants by the lower court (Lavelle, J.) which are now before us. Therefore, we must first direct our attention to the habeas corpus matters since the Rule 1100 issue becomes moot if the orders of the lower court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. RouxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WojdakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. OwenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. DavenportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API