Commonwealth v. Phillips
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, President Judge:
Appellant Jeffrey Phillips was convicted by a jury of receiving stolen property and escape. The only issue he raises on this appeal is whether the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain his conviction of receiving stolen property. A review of the record indicates that the evidence was sufficient. Our review of the record also indicates, however, that the sentence imposed upon appellant was illegal; we therefore remand this case to the lower court for resentencing.
The test for determining sufficiency of the evidence is whether, accepting as true all evidence and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KostkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LoschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.