Legal Opinion

Foglio v. Western Auto Supply

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1976No. Civ. 15286PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff, a minor, brought the instant action for damages for the loss of an eye when he was allegedly struck by a projectile discharged from a rotary power lawnmower manufactured by defendant M.T.D. Corporation (M.T.D.) and sold by defendant Western Auto Supply Corporation (Western Auto). Plaintiff’s action was based solely on the theory of strict liability of a manufacturer or distributor for marketing a defectively designed product. A jury trial resulted in a defense verdict and plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment for defendants.

Since plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Luque v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. DeLeon v. Commercial Manufacturing & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp.California Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API