DeLeon v. Commercial Manufacturing & Supply Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOOLPERT, J.
Is custom-made factory equipment which is safe to use in some locations “defective” because in a particular location its use may bring the operator in contact with an adjacent rotating line shaft built and maintained by the plant owners? In this case the trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the defendant equipment manufacturer on the theory that the manufacturer was not responsible for choosing the location of the equipment in the fruit processing line; therefore, the equipment, having no inherent defect, could not be the cause of the plaintiff-employee’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
- O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Wright v. Stang Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.