Legal Opinion

DeLeon v. Commercial Manufacturing & Supply Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1983No. Civ. 7333PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOOLPERT, J.

Is custom-made factory equipment which is safe to use in some locations “defective” because in a particular location its use may bring the operator in contact with an adjacent rotating line shaft built and maintained by the plant owners? In this case the trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the defendant equipment manufacturer on the theory that the manufacturer was not responsible for choosing the location of the equipment in the fruit processing line; therefore, the equipment, having no inherent defect, could not be the cause of the plaintiff-employee’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
  2. O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Wright v. Stang Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API