Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Carver

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1950No. 32930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. The prima facie presumption, of want of reasonable skill and care on the part of the servants of railroad companies which arises upon proof of injury inflicted by the running of their locomotives or cars disappears upon the introduction of some evidence showing absence of such negligence. The burden of proof then shifts to the plaintiff to show such negligence as will authorize recovery. See Code § 94-1108; Jones v. Powell, 71 Ga. App. 202 (30 S. E. 2d, 446).

2. Where, as here, the conduct alleged to be negligent, upon which the-plaintiff relies for recovery is such that the sole conclusion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. MacOn Telegraph Publishing Co. v. GradenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Jones v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Lester v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Greenway v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. J. C. Penney Co. v. Malouf Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Stapleton v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Fox v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API