Legal Opinion

J. C. Penney Co. v. Malouf Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1972No. 46598, 46599PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

1. We first treat appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeals on the grounds that they are premature.

There are two principal methods by which an appeal might he brought from orders in multi-claim party cases as to less than all the claims or parties involved. One is, the complaining party may obtain a certificate of immediate review from the trial judge under the provisions of Section 1 (a2) of the Appellate Practice Act (Code Ann. § 6-701 (a2); Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073). The second method is where the trial judge enters an order upon an express determination that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Parker v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Woolfolk Chemical Works, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Thompson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  5. FH Ross & Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J. C. Penney Co. v. Malouf Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood Mosaic Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Williamson v. Perret's Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Dehler v. SetliffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. J. C. Penney Co. v. Malouf Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API